Fishes in space
StŽphan G. Reebs
UniversitŽ de Moncton, Canada
2007
Odd
behaviour of fishes in space
As far as I
know, the first time fish behaviour was observed in the zero-gravity
environment of outer space was in 1975, when a couple of mummichogs, Fundulus
heteroclitus, were
flown in a plastic bag aquarium aboard Skylab. The crew regularly checked how
their charges were doing, and they actually filmed the fishÕs behaviour on days
3 and 22 of the mission. On day 3, both fish incessantly ÒdoveÓ – pitched
downward – and thus swam in tight circles, as if stuck to the hands of a
clock, a behaviour for which the name ÒloopingÓ was coined. The frequency of
looping decreased steadily on subsequent days, until it eventually disappeared.
When the fish were filmed again on day 22, they both swam normally with their backs
turned towards the cabinÕs light source (this is a behaviour known as the
Òdorsal light responseÓ – more on that later). However, episodes of looping
could still be triggered by gently shaking the bag aquarium. Fifty eggs at an
advanced stage of development had also been taken on board, and 48 of them
hatched during the flight. The hatchlings swam normally.[1]
In a follow-up study, 21-day old mummichogs were flown
on Skylab again, and this time astronauts (on day 9) reported a lack of dorsal
light response.[2] Other work with carp flown on
the space shuttle Endeavour in September 1992 showed a disruption of the dorsal
light response for the first 3 days but a gradual recovery thereafter.[3]
The dorsal
light response was already well known from earthbound observations. Two
mechanisms allow a fish to figure out which way is down (or up) on earth. In
the first one, minuscule corpuscles in the inner ear are pulled down by gravity
until they set off sensory cells. Depending on the direction of gravity,
different cells are stimulated, enabling the fish to know which way is down. This
is called the Òvestibular righting responseÓ, and fishes share this mechanism
with land vertebrates, including humans. The second mechanism is simple: the
direction where light comes from is interpreted as ÒupÓ. This is manifest in the tendency of fish
to turn their backs towards a light (hence the moniker Òdorsal light responseÓ).
For fish, light is a good directional cue because in an aquatic environment it usually
comes from above and only from above. In terrestrial habitats the ground can
reflect light back up, but in any moderately deep body of water no light ever
comes from below.
One can
demonstrate the dorsal light response by placing a fish in a vertical tube so narrow
that the fish has no choice but to take a head-down posture. Then a single light
is turned on, on the lefthand side for example. If the dorsal light response is
well established in that species and in that individual (the phenomenon, though
widespread, is not universal), the fish will swivel inside the tube until its
back is turned to the light.
Another way
to demonstrate the dorsal light response is to look head on at a fish in an
ordinary aquarium, again with the only light coming horizontally from the side.
Rather than staying perfectly vertical, the fish will slant its back slightly
towards the light. The degree of slant can be taken as a measure of the
relative importance of light versus gravity as a cue for the fish to determine
which way is up. The more slant there is, the more important light is relative
to gravity. If gravity is paramount, the body will remain perfectly vertical.
If light is paramount, the fish will swim Òon its sideÓ, with its back exactly towards
the light. In that respect, it is worth noting that in Skylab, where there was
no gravity, all fish turned their back completely to the light (except, in some
cases, during the first few days of the mission). Light was the only cue they
had to figure out which way was ÒupÓ.
Looping
behaviour was also known before 1975, though not really because of earthbound
observations. Instead, it had been witnessed in goldfish taken for a ride on
parabolic flights in 1969 and 1972. A parabolic flight is achieved when a plane
climbs at a relatively steep angle to a high altitude and then briefly levels
off before diving down. The manoeuvre (which, if it could be seen from the
side, would describe the general shape of a parabola) creates an upward centrifugal
force that completely counteracts gravity (the counteracting is made easier by
the fact that gravity at high altitude is already weak to start with). The
zero-gravity phase lasts for less than a minute. All goldfish taken on such
flights had looped without fail during the zero-gravity phase. Some had also
performed spinning movements, like corkscrews.
In the same
way that a transfer from normal gravity to zero gravity induces looping,
raising a fish in conditions of higher than normal gravity (this is done by
putting an aquarium in a huge centrifuge and letting it turn for weeks on end) induces
looping once the fish is brought back to normal conditions.[4]
Motion
sickness in fishes
Many
astronauts become motion sick during the first 2-3 days of a space mission. On
earth, motion sickness consists of a malaise (often leading to vomiting) felt
when the body is suddenly accelerated or decelerated or when it changes its
direction of movement, especially when information coming from the eyes
suggests that no such motion should take place. Sea sickness is a typical
example. In the case of astronauts, the symptoms are the same, but the cause is
different: the problem arise because of movements performed in weightlessness. In
this case the illness is called Òspace motion sicknessÓ. Astronauts eventually
adjust and get better after a few days. However, after landing on earth they
often go through another bout of sensory-motor disorders, again for a few days.
Fish have not
been reported vomiting in space or during parabolic flights. However, the
occurrence of looping – a quantifiable behaviour easily witnessed –
follows a similar timeline to that of space motion sickness. Therefore it is
thought that fish could serve as an animal model to study space motion sickness
and possibly find ways to alleviate it.[5]
Note in
passing that people – back on earth – who regularly move fish in
transport tanks sometimes see their fish vomiting while in transit, especially
when the tanks are roughly shaken. This seems to be a case of motion sickness.
Fish vomiting in transit form the basis of claims to the effect that even fish
can get seasick. A more accurate statement
would be that even fish can get motion sick.
The
first vertebrate mating in space
In the
1990s, a team of Japanese scientists headed by Kenichi Ijiri explored the
possibility of sending more fish in space, this time aboard the space shuttle
Columbia.[6]
The idea was to see if fish could
be induced to mate successfully in the absence of gravity (and, by the same
token, to provide the first example of a successful vertebrate mating in space).
The fish species they chose was the medaka (Oryzias latipes), a tough, prolific breeder and a
very popular pet fish in Japan. As a preliminary step, the scientists observed
the behaviour of medaka during parabolic flights. What they saw was some good
old looping. This was not surprising (up to then all fish species had looped in
zero or near-zero gravity) but still it was disheartening because it is hard to
imagine two fish courting and mating successfully while looping
incessantly. Even if the medaka
were to settle down after a few days, as the mummichogs had done aboard Skylab,
they might still not mate because of the general exhaustion and lack of eating
resulting from all the looping. But the scientists persevered: they took a
great number of medaka on parabolic flights until they found some that did not
loop. Then back in the lab they bred those few individuals to create a strain
of non-loopers from which they could select the future medaka-astronauts.
Interestingly,
these fish refrained from looping only when there was light. If kept in the
dark during parabolic flights, all medaka looped (the scientists observed the
fish under infrared light and with infrared goggles). Ijiri and his team
posited that non-loopers were particularly predisposed towards using light as a
cue for maintaining position. Indeed, when submitted to visual tests, the
non-loopers scored particularly well. (One such test consists of placing a fish
in a circular tank with rotating walls. The walls are painted with vertical
stripes. When the walls rotate, the fish have a tendency to follow the stripes
and thus swim around the tank – this is the so-called Òoptomotor responseÓ,
often explained with the argument that trying to stay at a constant distance
from a landmark may be a way to maintain position in a current.[7]
Fish with good vision keep swimming around the tank even when the walls rotate
very quickly, whereas fish with poorer vision soon see the rotating stripes as
a blur and stop moving.)
When medaka
are in the mood, they can mate and produce eggs every day. The Japanese
researchers selected two non-looping males and two non-looping females who were
particularly assiduous at breeding. These were placed in a special enclosed
aquarium that was loaded on board the space shuttle Columbia some 30 hours
before its launch in July 1994. Lift-off took place without a hitch and already
24 h into the mission a few eggs could be seen inside the aquarium (the
aquarium had been built so that a current would sweep any free-floating eggs
into a small compartment where a mesh protected the eggs against any
cannibalistic attack by the adults). On the third day, a male and a female were
caught on video in the typical medaka mating posture, the male clasping the
female with his fins. The scene was repeated many times during the whole
mission, and eggs were steadily produced. On the 12th day of the
15-day mission, the first egg hatched normally. By the time the shuttle landed,
the aquarium contained 11 fry and 27 embryonated eggs. All of these eggs
hatched successfully within three days of the landing.
Interestingly,
for some time after the landing the four adult medaka looked awkward and seemed
to have trouble swimming. It took them three days before they returned to
normal. All fry, however, swam without any problem.[8]
These space-born fry grew up
normally and went on mating with one another on earth, and their successive
generations have been distributed to elementary schools and school children
throughout Japan.
[1] von Baumgarten, RJ, Simmonds, RC, Boyd,
JF, and Garriott, OK, 1975, Effects of prolonged weightlessness on the swimming
pattern of fish aboard Skylab 3, Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 46, 902-906.
[2] Hoffman, R.B.,
Salinas, G.A., and Baky, A.A., 1977, Behavioral analyses of killifish exposed
to weightlessness in the Apollo-Soyuz test project, Aviation Space and
Environmental Medicine 48, 712-717.
[3] Mori, S., Mitarai, G., Takabayashi,
A., Usui, S., Sakakibara, M., Nagatomo, M., and von Baumgarten, R.J., 1996,
Evidence of sensory conflict and recovery in carp exposed to prolonged
weightlessness, Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 67, 256-261.
[4] Anken, R.H., and Rahmann, H., 1999, Effect of
altered gravity on the neurobiology of fish, Naturwissenschaften 86, 155-167.
[5] Idem
[7] For an entry into the literature on optomotor
responses, see: Brain-encysting parasites affect visually-mediated behaviours
of fathead minnows, ƒcoscience 8: 289-293, and references therein.
[8] However, further experiments with
medaka on space shuttle flights indicated that fry hatched in space could be
less mobile than fry hatched on earth: Niihori, M., Mogami, Y., Naruse, K., and
Baba, S.A. 2004, Development and swimming behavior of Medaka fry in a
spaceflight aboard the space shuttle Columbia (STS-107), Zoological Science 21:
923-931.